Re:Young 'pranksters' skewed landmark sexuality study
by Crito on Friday January 24, 2014 @10:58PM
(#7119787)
My understanding is that the "placebo effect" doesn't refer to biased numbers or reporting, but exists when everything is measured correctly. It is objectively there, not a screwy result.
Re:Young 'pranksters' skewed landmark sexuality study
by yaddayadda on Friday January 24, 2014 @11:09PM
(#7119810)
You're correct. What saalweachter was describing are ways to minimize threats to reliability and validity.
- http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/relandval.php
- http://www.mathcs.duq.edu/~packer/Courses/Psy624/Validity.ht...
Re:Young 'pranksters' skewed landmark sexuality study
by saalweachter on Friday January 24, 2014 @11:34PM
(#7119866)
"Biased" is probably a loaded word. I think I may have implied intent without meaning to.
But basically, the placebo effect only exists for subjective measurements. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo#Mechanism_of_the_effect) If something exists only in subjective measurements and not objective measurements... I'll let you draw your own inference.
In brief, any time you have a subjective measurement (for instance, the experimenter assigns a number from 1 to 5 based on how "distressed" the mice -- or human patients -- look), that subjective measurement can be subtly biased. So if the experimenter doesn't blind his experiments properly, you can see a placebo effect in animal studies.
It is appropriate to refer to these studies as double or triple blind because the single blind usually refers to the patient.
So animal studies can be assumed to be single blind by default, and become double-blind when the experimenters do not know the group identities.