Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers

Re:Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers by petertodd on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @10:48PM (#7106902)

What makes you think those arguments are coming from the good Bitcoin devs/theorists? That community - I'm a part of it - thinks altcoins are valuable testing grounds for ideas and have used Litecoin for testing out new ideas in the past.

But Litecoin has the very competent Warren Togami as lead dev right now; if dogecoin had competent devs maintaining the client they'd get some respect. But they don't.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers by melarina on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @11:28PM (#7106989)

Before Charles Lee started Litecoin he created Fairbrix, a re-branded and tweaked version of Tenebrix. If you know anything about what happened to Fairbrix it is clear he was learning on the job (not a "competent dev" by your standards). Looking down your nose at Dogecoin's devs because they are still learning the codebase is pretty hypocriticial.

http://www.coindesk.com/litecoin-founder-charles-lee-on-the-...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers by petertodd on Thursday January 23, 2014 @01:30AM (#7107205)

That's why I specifically said Warren Togami - he's taken over from Charles Lee as the main driver of Litecoin development and has done an excellent job at that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers by jaekwon on Thursday January 23, 2014 @03:31AM (#7107420)

I'm pretty sure they don't want your respect. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]