News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers by lvs on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:23PM (#7106310)
Boy, I really wouldn't want to work with you. The unfortunate situation to which you're referring was the result of trying to mitigate a microtransaction attack that was happening on the blockchain. It was a rock and a hard place situation, and because the community was still relatively small and focused, the devs tried to get everyone to upgrade simultaneously. They chose to risk a fork rather than risk effectively dead-ending the blockchain with dust. There was no good solution that didn't come with risks, but it certainly wasn't a result of "idiocy" as you flippantly imply.
Re:Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers by alttab on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @10:10PM (#7106835)
If I were to edit this post, I could remove both the first and last sentence and it would still hold its meaning.
Re:Dogecoin and the Appeal of Small Numbers by lvs on Thursday January 23, 2014 @12:28AM (#7107110)
No, it wouldn't.