Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by priyakanth024 on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:20AM
(#7102145)
Dude, you could've easily made money out it. I for one would've definitely bought it. Your product is superb, simple and gives us capability to add stuff on top of it like authentication
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by electerious on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:25AM
(#7102165)
Thanks! Donations are welcome :)
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by dangravell on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:31AM
(#7102177)
No - you didn't read what (s)he wrote. You should charge. Charging people real money gets you real users who give you real feedback. It allows you to allocate more money to the development of the project.
Providing this tool for free is a cost to you.
Sure, allow a certain number of photos free of charge and charge for more.
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by egeozcan on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:35AM
(#7102203)
I also agree. I want to pay for this, not donate. This can be very important for my personal needs and I want to rely on it. If I donate, I don't get the feeling that the project is moving forward.
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by belorn on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:48AM
(#7102257)
Simple solution, they provide a package that is the program and a friendly service contract which provide help setting it up or adding customization.
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by unicornporn on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @08:02AM
(#7102315)
OK, seems everybody wants to pay per copy, am I rite? I think that is a pretty bad idea that will slow down adoption and development. Yes, this is an open-source project and more developers could help out. I think developers are less likely to jump on the wagon to help out a duo that gets all the money.
Instead, don't try to monetize this now. Make adoption and interest grow. Then sell a hosted variant at lychee.io, Wordpress stylee. Or be more imaginative than that and come up with a better idea.
Great software anyways! Thanks!
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by dangravell on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @09:44AM
(#7102738)
Make something of value -> now sell it.
Why be more imaginative? It sounds a pretty simple offering to me, and is highly transparent.
A hosted variant isn't a bad idea (I was going to ask if there were recipes for EC2, Docker etc... some people might want to "self" host on a machine they control) but it's more "value added" than the original codebase.
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by egeozcan on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @08:27AM
(#7102403)
Many developers have been selling support for WordPress for a long time. Even back when it wasn't as massively popular as it is now. I wouldn't mind contributing to an open source project where some developers sell support as long as I can fork away when there is a disagreement (read: permissive license).
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by dangravell on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:57AM
(#7102288)
That's ok, but that's a services business. That means committing time. It's difficult to build a fly-wheel that way. I guess you could outsource on oDesk or similar.
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by belorn on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @08:38AM
(#7102434)
I do not think anyone should sell products without understanding the service part of doing business.
if you buy something, people expect someone to be responsible for the product. This mean you got to spend time on providing service, or it get defined by most people as a cash grab.
Re:Show HN: Lychee — Self-hosted photo-management done right
by dangravell on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @09:41AM
(#7102721)
Oh, of course, provide support (great support at that) by all means. I thought you meant getting into the murky world of custom installations.