News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Functions Should Be Short And Sweet, But Why?. Parent comment

Re:Functions Should Be Short And Sweet, But Why? by ufo on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @07:01AM (#7102084)
but on that opther hand, this means added complexity in all the cases where you dont overload it. Whoever reads the program will always have to keep overloading in mind.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Functions Should Be Short And Sweet, But Why? by pedalpete on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @02:12PM (#7104675)
hence a good naming convention. If the function name is clear, than it shouldn't be a mind drain at all, particularly if it is only a one line function.
[ Parent | on HN ]