News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Functions Should Be Short And Sweet, But Why? by agumonkey on Wednesday January 22, 2014 @06:47AM (#7102043)
I remember doing something similar in college using Eclipse/Java (but any static analysis friendly language with on-the-fly type checker would do) and it was pure fun. You just write the code as you'd want it to be, the IDE will flag missing classes/interfaces and generate them on the go if you tell them, and if down the road you use one interface differently the IDE will extend or ~reparameterize it for you. You end up with an abstract system/algorithm that works by type checked interfaces you can now implement.

There are no comments on this comment yet.