Re:100 growth hacks 100 days | 21 to 30
by minimaxir on Monday January 20, 2014 @11:16AM
(#7090219)
A note to all budding "growth hackers": conspiring to upvote a growth hacking article such that it hits the front page of HN doesn't work.
If the article is obviously blogspam, flagging will correct that very, very quickly. As was the case with this post, which hit #10, then went off the front page in less than one minute.
Re:100 growth hacks 100 days | 21 to 30
by c16 on Monday January 20, 2014 @11:24AM
(#7090260)
How is it blog spam? I assume buffer posts are blog spam equally? If anything, I learnt a few new things here such as the 'all in one stage' or 'break it into multiple stages' slide. Hardly blog spam.
Re:100 growth hacks 100 days | 21 to 30
by minimaxir on Monday January 20, 2014 @11:33AM
(#7090308)
This is different from the typical Buffer post.
Top 10 lists are almost unequivocally blogspam, as it's usually a list of things without much depth and insight (including this submission). A Top 100 list is worse. (how can you do a comparative analysis on 100 entries anyways?). A subset of a Top X list is even worse.
Re:100 growth hacks 100 days | 21 to 30
by andygcook on Monday January 20, 2014 @11:22AM
(#7090249)
This deck would be more compelling if the format was: idea -> explanation -> experiment -> result.
There are a few slides in here for experiments that haven't been launched yet, which gives me the idea for the growth hack, but no measure on how it might perform.
If the article is obviously blogspam, flagging will correct that very, very quickly. As was the case with this post, which hit #10, then went off the front page in less than one minute.
Top 10 lists are almost unequivocally blogspam, as it's usually a list of things without much depth and insight (including this submission). A Top 100 list is worse. (how can you do a comparative analysis on 100 entries anyways?). A subset of a Top X list is even worse.
There are a few slides in here for experiments that haven't been launched yet, which gives me the idea for the growth hack, but no measure on how it might perform.