MRA at this time is strongly linked to wingnuts.

That is not to say there there is no benefit to considering the rights of men or the problems that men face with issues like violent attack or custody disputes.

"Disturbed individuals"? Did you read the articles? The people being describes are the leaders of the "movement", like Elam. The "movement" obviously encourages the behavior being described -- meanwhile, groups like CAIR work hard to address the popular image of the terrorist Muslim. Where is the CAIR of "men's rights" I wonder

FYI, CAIR is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. It's a dangerous organization.

There are some Muslim leaders that express disturbing things as well. Once again, this does not make them the voice of mainstream Islam. If you actually visit a large men's rights community, like http://reddit.com/r/mensrights, you'll find that some women participate in discussion as well and the men are not the rape-happy bugaboos that many paint MRAs in general to be.

Oh hey look the top story is someone "cherry-picking" a paragraph from an article one person wrote, about rape. Glad I took the time to visit

It's almost as if movements in general - feminism and the men's rights movement included - are prone to partisan sensationalism.

I'm confused; "feminism" isn't a singular movement at all

Mainstream segments of the movement, if you will. The mainstream of any movement is where a sense of tribal identity emerges that's likely to engage in partisan disparagement of other movements seen as opposition.