> (Oh I'm sorry, did I just libel Her Majesty's judicial system? How careless of me. I should watch what I write).
guess I missed the bit of the US constitution where other people's databases were considered protected speech.
Look, this is getting old. We had a massive libel reform which, while not as revolutionary as many people wanted, still made significant changes, and you are doing the thousands of people that worked hard to make that happen a giant disservice. Please read up on the status quo before making cheap jabs.
We're sidetracked, but that's pretty much the definition of libel tourism, and the UK is notorious for it:
http://www.economist.com/node/12903058
The UK routinely finds libel judgements against non-Britons, outside of Britain, having essentially no connection with the UK. It's an extremely broken system responsible for widespread legal harassment outside of Britain (examples in article).
It's not enforceable in the US obviously. There's a US law that explicitly prohibits that, provoked by a particularly egregious case.
(Oh I'm sorry, did I just libel Her Majesty's judicial system? How careless of me. I should watch what I write).