Re:Announcing: The Zed Shaw Celebutante License
by clintjhill on Wednesday July 15, 2009 @05:42PM
(#706654)
Lighten up.
Re:Announcing: The Zed Shaw Celebutante License
by zimbabwe on Wednesday July 15, 2009 @08:42PM
(#706938)
Sorry; I wasn't trying to offend. For what it's worth, I didn't downvote your original comment. You were at 0 and I thought your post was worth a debate.
It was smug of you to suggest that we didn't like Zed because of feelings of inferiority, but my response was not intended to be a personal insult in any way.
Re:Announcing: The Zed Shaw Celebutante License
by raghus on Wednesday July 15, 2009 @07:05PM
(#706808)
HN lightened up your comment
Re:Announcing: The Zed Shaw Celebutante License
by clintjhill on Wednesday July 15, 2009 @06:04PM
(#706698)
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. E.g. "That is an idiotic thing to say; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
Responding to multiple people with the snide "I guess I'm a smug prick" doesn't help things either.