News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mother by mortenjorck on Tuesday January 14, 2014 @07:21PM (#7060798)
Even allowing for a language barrier, this has to be the most overtly Huxleyan branding I've seen on a consumer product. It's unnerving.
Re:Mother by brazzy on Wednesday January 15, 2014 @03:05AM (#7062191)
Hm, my candidate:

A couple standing in front of an ATM, she ovviously pregnant, on the screen there is an image of a house, speech bubble "Oh! How does it know we were thinking of moving to a bigger home?"

Saw this on a wall in the conference room of an ATM maker, about 10 years ago...

Re:Mother by catshirt on Tuesday January 14, 2014 @07:55PM (#7060946)
considering Futurama's "Mom" character, it's even more uncanny.
Re:Mother by allochthon on Tuesday January 14, 2014 @11:03PM (#7061601)
this has to be the most overtly Huxleyan branding I've seen on a consumer product

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing for the product they're selling, which is both cool and odd in a 1984 kind of way.

Re:Mother by mmanfrin on Wednesday January 15, 2014 @03:47AM (#7062295)
1984 was Orwell. Huxley was Brave New World.
Re:Mother by sneak on Wednesday January 15, 2014 @08:21AM (#7063152)
Also, it seemed to me that the dichotomy set up in BNW is that "natural is good and right, artificial or new is bad" - one that has soured me on Huxley basically since when I first read it.
Re:Mother by romaniv on Wednesday January 15, 2014 @11:10AM (#7064120)
The author commented on that in his foreword of later editions of the book. He said something along the lines that if he was writing the novel later in his life, the dichotomy wouldn't be as pointed.
Re:Mother by makmanalp on Wednesday January 15, 2014 @03:51AM (#7062313)
I think "mother knows best" would have been much less creepy.
Re:Mother by catwork on Wednesday January 15, 2014 @11:47AM (#7064326)
Except for kids and parents who saw "Tangled."