News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ghost 0.4 Released by pingswept on Monday January 13, 2014 @10:33AM (#7051106)
To paraphrase John O'Nolan in his original Kickstarter video for Ghost, Ghost is designed for users, not to please investors or potential acquirers. You can hear the original here: https://ghost.org/features/ starting around 2:05 in the video.
Re:Ghost 0.4 Released by vdaniuk on Monday January 13, 2014 @11:28AM (#7051497)
That is absolutely irrelevant to the corruption claims of OP and doesnt answer my question.
Re:Ghost 0.4 Released by pingswept on Monday January 13, 2014 @12:16PM (#7051889)
But I am OP. That's what I meant when I wrote corruption-- the idea that a nonprofit will be more user-focused since they can't be acquisition-focused, since they're not an acquisition target.
Re:Ghost 0.4 Released by vdaniuk on Monday January 13, 2014 @12:49PM (#7052099)
Well, ok then. In general user value and investor value are orthogonal to each other. In closed-source, proprietory, vendor locked-in products there is a conflict of interests between value for investors and value for users. I just don't see this conflict in open source software, it happens, but rarely.