Very funny, gdb. Ve-ery funny

Re:Very funny, gdb. Ve-ery funny by fafner on Saturday January 11, 2014 @09:42PM (#7044922)

Bullshit. GDB is improving constantly. Last time I checked LLDB was inferior. So stop spreading lies!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Very funny, gdb. Ve-ery funny by comex on Saturday January 11, 2014 @10:50PM (#7045087)

I downvoted you because of the tone of your post, but I do tend to agree with you - almost everything about LLDB strikes me as pretty crappy, although unfortunately the same applies to GDB. In this case, LLDB is no better:

    (lldb) print v[0]
    error: call to a function 'std::__1::vector<int, std::__1::allocator<int> >::operator[](unsigned long)' ('_ZNSt3__16vectorIiNS_9allocatorIiEEEixEm') that is not present in the target
    error: The expression could not be prepared to run in the target
    (lldb) version
    lldb-300.2.53

[ Parent | on HN ]