Size is might, even if it's blundering, wasteful, and inefficient. (Although I am not saying the US is any of those things).
The question is whether or not might is good! (As in, is it better for your own government to be mighty or puny)
Many folks would rather live in puny Switzerland or Sweden than mighty Russia and China.
I faintly recall a study (by an Icelandic economist, if memory serves) which showed that Iceland had one of the lowest "corruption ratings" in the entire world! Perhaps I or the study are mistaken. Wouldn't be the first time.
The examples of corruption I'm thinking of are all related to the financial crash and Icesave scandal in Iceland.
Normally most people consider corruption to be some kind of private-public intermingling. But this was all about the public side trying to protect itself (I think?).
http://www.voxeu.org/article/government-failures-iceland-ent...
Compare US to UK. California to Washington (state). EU to formerly more independent nations.
In each case the larger state delivers services less effectively, with more waste, arguably more corruption, and more useless nanny state rules.