Re:Red Hat’s CentOS “acquisition” good for both sides, but ‘...
by TallGuyShort on Friday January 10, 2014 @05:34PM
(#7040091)
I question my own understanding here, because I still don't think I grok all the motivation for this action (on both sides), but I don't think it's a conflict of interest. Nobody buys RHEL because they can't get it anywhere else. They buy it because it's what Red Hat officially supports. Or they buy it for one of the add-on projects that you have to pay for, like Satellite, etc. I don't think any of that changes with the merger. Just my 2c, though, because again - I feel like I'm missing something.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.