Simple git workflow is simple

Re:Simple git workflow is simple by mattdawson on Friday January 10, 2014 @10:22AM (#7036985)

This is most definitely not git flow. Git flow advocates explicit merges pretty much everywhere with no fast-forwards and definitely no rebasing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Simple git workflow is simple by shaggyfrog on Friday January 10, 2014 @12:53PM (#7038112)

Rebasing locally before "publishing" (pushing) changes to the central repo is definitely okay. It should always be done before pushing the branch for the first time, really, because if someone else has modified develop since you started your branch, you want to make sure your changes are still working and won't break the build (on develop).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Simple git workflow is simple by codereflection on Friday January 10, 2014 @10:30AM (#7037041)

You're right, it's not. I need to stop commenting on HN before I've had coffee. :/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Simple git workflow is simple by middleclick on Friday January 10, 2014 @10:41AM (#7037119)

Is there a link where I can read up the type of Git flow that you are talking about?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Simple git workflow is simple by LoganCale on Friday January 10, 2014 @10:48AM (#7037164)

http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/

[ Parent | on HN ]