Re:Calorie restrictive eating for longer life? The story we ...
by jongraehl on Tuesday July 14, 2009 @12:33AM
(#703109)
I was entertained by your fact-finding mission. I only skimmed the original diatribe.
Still, the fact that deaths were removed from the data at all (exactly in favor of the pet hypothesis of the researchers) because they "didn't count" is extremely suspicious, even if it may prove justified (by other confirming studies).
Still, the fact that deaths were removed from the data at all (exactly in favor of the pet hypothesis of the researchers) because they "didn't count" is extremely suspicious, even if it may prove justified (by other confirming studies).