News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google+ invite lands man in jail by hyperpape on Thursday January 09, 2014 @08:49AM (#7030399)
It's true that it isn't nearly as effective as you'd hope but it does help enhance your ability to get the police quickly involved, establish a paper trail, etc.
Re:Google+ invite lands man in jail by einhverfr on Thursday January 09, 2014 @09:57AM (#7030765)
None of that matters if you are dead.

If someone is out to kill you, go hide with relatives, some ways not too close. Don't serve them with a restraining order.

Re:Google+ invite lands man in jail by aestra on Thursday January 09, 2014 @10:53AM (#7031132)
>If someone is out to kill you, go hide with relatives, some ways not too close.

Define not too close. My closest relatives are over 200 miles away. Am I expected to quit my job? Take my children (If I had them) out of school? For how long?

This person may know exactly who all your relatives are and where they live, thus know exactly where to find you anyways.

Re:Google+ invite lands man in jail by hyperpape on Thursday January 09, 2014 @11:22AM (#7031313)
I think the real answer is "don't take advice from HN". I know someone who moved halfway across the country to avoid domestic violence. Sometimes it is an answer. It shouldn't ever need to be, but in reality, it's sometimes the only option a woman has available.
Re:Google+ invite lands man in jail by rmc on Friday January 10, 2014 @05:18AM (#7035957)
So let's create some new options like restraining orders.
Re:Google+ invite lands man in jail by hyperpape on Thursday January 09, 2014 @10:07AM (#7030817)
Fair enough for that literal description, meaning that the parent poster was sloppy. But at some point between an unfriendly breakup and literal threats of murder, the restraining order is the right response. I think that's the key point.
Re:Google+ invite lands man in jail by einhverfr on Thursday January 09, 2014 @10:10PM (#7034871)
Oh sure. I would even say a "credible threat of murder."