News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Another go at Go failed by sixthloginorso on Wednesday January 08, 2014 @08:44AM (#7023372)
It has a state-of-the-art Virtual Machine, rich concurrency facilities (why does everyone forget this?), reasonable type safety, great tooling, and it operates within a diverse ecosystem of languages using the same infrastructure.

But yeah, I have always liked the argument of throwing a curve ball at the kids who were already programming in imperative languages. It also levels the playing field and those who hadn't had any prior experience tend to perform better without feeling so inadequate next to their peers.

Re:Another go at Go failed by dschiptsov on Thursday January 09, 2014 @04:14AM (#7029494)
Rich concurrency facilities based on pthreads and murexes provided by an OS, so no miracles here, just the same broken by design stuff.
Re:Another go at Go failed by sixthloginorso on Thursday January 09, 2014 @08:03AM (#7030183)
Care to expand? I still find that Java's are some of the best concurrency libraries you'll find, among imperative languages or otherwise.