Re:Built to Fail: What Google, Ideo, and 37signals have in c...
by joez on Monday July 13, 2009 @02:07PM
(#702177)
There is a difference between planning to fail and failure-tolerant.
People and companies still need to have long term vision of what to do "in case" your product is actually good, your startup actually gets funded, and of success in general. This turns you into a proactive player.
If all one does is have a system in place that reacts when something goes wrong, then this is really being reactive.
People and companies still need to have long term vision of what to do "in case" your product is actually good, your startup actually gets funded, and of success in general. This turns you into a proactive player.
If all one does is have a system in place that reacts when something goes wrong, then this is really being reactive.
I believe Andrew is missing the bigger picture.