News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Losing Aaron: Bob Swartz on MIT's role in his son's death. Parent comment

Re:Losing Aaron: Bob Swartz on MIT's role in his son's death by arabellatv on Friday January 03, 2014 @02:09AM (#7004513)
Yes. I agree. What were MIT's and Heymann's true motivations for blowing it up to a security issue? Did they act out of fear or out of ego? Regardless, they exacerbated the issue (just as media sensationalizes stories). It's upsetting that such intelligent people would fail to think through the situation. Or even worse...they did think it through and planned to blow this up as big as possible to prove a point or make an example out of Swartz?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Losing Aaron: Bob Swartz on MIT's role in his son's death by danielweber on Friday January 03, 2014 @08:11AM (#7005229)
It was a security issue because some guy kept on breaking into their network and had escalated to physical intrusion to achieve his goals.

They didn't know the guy was Aaron Swartz and that they ought to have been privileged to have him on their network, invited or not.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Losing Aaron: Bob Swartz on MIT's role in his son's death by sigzero on Friday January 03, 2014 @08:44AM (#7005330)
I am taking the second sentence as sarcasm.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Losing Aaron: Bob Swartz on MIT's role in his son's death by walid on Saturday January 04, 2014 @07:00AM (#7010801)
Why are you taking it as sarcasm? MIT didn't know it was him until they installed a camera and guest logins are the norm and apparently/reportedly have high privileges.
[ Parent | on HN ]