Can-Do vs. Can’t-Do Culture

Re:Can-Do vs. Can’t-Do Culture by jasonwocky on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:34AM (#6999316)

I dunno. Sounds like there's a chance that the economist's own biases are coming into play here. I'd apply the Principle of Indifference...."No, because" and "Yes, if" pretty much sound like the same thing to me. It's how you react to those phrases that makes all the difference.

If you let "Yes, if" evoke a different emotional response than, "No, because", even though they provide more or less the same information content, what does that say about you?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Can-Do vs. Can’t-Do Culture by vbuterin on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:58AM (#6999384)

Actually, it's "no, unless" and "yes, if" that are synonyms. "No, because" carries the implication that the listed justifications are irresolvable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Can-Do vs. Can’t-Do Culture by jasonwocky on Thursday January 02, 2014 @08:34AM (#6999485)

I won't argue that "No, because" and "Yes, if" are mathematically equivalent statements. But I hold that the immutability implication you mention is something added by the listener, not information "carried" by the bits of the "No, because."

They may not be proper synonyms, but a listener that's forgiving of input errors can interpret them as synonyms, at least until proven otherwise through further conversation.

[ Parent | on HN ]