Re:Apple to Build $1B Server Farm in North Carolina
by htsh on Saturday July 11, 2009 @02:24PM
(#699407)
I'd love to hear other people's speculation as to what they're doing. I think that they're going to build a massive suite a cloud-based apps, potentially even offering things like your iTunes library wherever you are on the internet. And I wouldn't even be surprised if pro-level stuff like Final Cut & Soundbooth made its way to the cloud at some point.
It makes sense to me as there's a big overall shift in that direction. Thoughts?
Re:Apple to Build $1B Server Farm in North Carolina
by jonknee on Saturday July 11, 2009 @11:21AM
(#699265)
Why? Data centers provide a small number of jobs and use enormous amounts of electricity. They gave Apple $46m to get 50 jobs that pay $50k a year. Do the math, Apple got essentially free labor for the next 18 years.
Re:Apple to Build $1B Server Farm in North Carolina
by aneesh on Saturday July 11, 2009 @12:17PM
(#699322)
That's not quite correct. They didn't give Apple $46m. The $46m that they're "giving up" is money they would never have had otherwise. The town had 2 choices:
1) Don't give any tax break. Apple will likely go elsewhere, and the town doesn't get any additional tax revenue.
2) Give Apple a break on some fraction of their taxes, amounting to $46m. They will still get some tax revenue from Apple.
It's like saying a store is giving money when it puts a product on sale. The town is just lowering the price to sell more goods.
Re:Apple to Build $1B Server Farm in North Carolina
by euroclydon on Saturday July 11, 2009 @12:46PM
(#699349)
I wonder if all the small businesses in the city could get together and bluff the city: say then wanted the same deal as apple, or they will all close?
Don't these schemes seem illegal under the 14th amendment?
It makes sense to me as there's a big overall shift in that direction. Thoughts?
1) Don't give any tax break. Apple will likely go elsewhere, and the town doesn't get any additional tax revenue.
2) Give Apple a break on some fraction of their taxes, amounting to $46m. They will still get some tax revenue from Apple.
It's like saying a store is giving money when it puts a product on sale. The town is just lowering the price to sell more goods.
Don't these schemes seem illegal under the 14th amendment?