Re:The Disinformation
by jasonkester on Tuesday December 31, 2013 @06:19AM
(#6989986)
Indeed. Especially in light of their response to this article, paraphrased:
"It's not that we were trying to be malicious. It's just that we're incapable of parsing spoken English"
Followed up in a tweet with "To clarify, even after reading several detailed explanations of the spoken English in question, we're still unable to parse it".
So either way, malicious or dim, it's hard to imagine considering them a trustworthy source of news after this.
[Note: some of the above quotes have been edited slightly for compactness and clarity, as is common practice in such things.]
"It's not that we were trying to be malicious. It's just that we're incapable of parsing spoken English"
Followed up in a tweet with "To clarify, even after reading several detailed explanations of the spoken English in question, we're still unable to parse it".
So either way, malicious or dim, it's hard to imagine considering them a trustworthy source of news after this.
[Note: some of the above quotes have been edited slightly for compactness and clarity, as is common practice in such things.]