News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Disinformation by HCIdivision17 on Monday December 30, 2013 @06:43PM (#6987900)
Would a retraction/apology combination be effective here? Or is this just too egregious an error?

I, in turn, feel dumb asking, as I would have liked a subscription to a service like that. I wouldn't want to encourage this sort of nonsense, either.

Re:The Disinformation by Crito on Monday December 30, 2013 @07:26PM (#6988116)
"We reviewed the transcript again and shared it with Paul. We stand behind our excerpting and editing for clarity. We continue to believe that the quote is in its proper context. Thanks for checking in." http://valleywag.gawker.com/paul-graham-says-women-havent-be...

I wouldn't hold my breath for a retraction/apology. It sounds like they have dug in their heals.

Re:The Disinformation by HCIdivision17 on Monday December 30, 2013 @07:43PM (#6988198)
Am I mistaken that this is related to ValleyWag's stance and not The Information?

EDIT: yes, I am clearly mistaken on a second glance. I hadn't actually reached the end of the article's updates (curse browsing on a phone and careless reading).