News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twister: P2P micro-blogging with accounts on the blockcha... by johnchristopher on Monday December 30, 2013 @05:55PM (#6987645)
>What is the motivation of twister over bitmessage + namecoin.

Bitmessage is to mail what twister is to twitter ?

Re:Twister: P2P micro-blogging with accounts on the blockcha... by quack on Monday December 30, 2013 @06:05PM (#6987706)
Bitmessage is for any messaging system. You can broadcast (twitter), send private message (email), or start a channel (IRC). The key in bitmessage is that to send a message you have to do a POW according to the size of the message you are sending.

Even then you still have massive data bloat problems, which I dont see DHT alone solving.

Re:Twister: P2P micro-blogging with accounts on the blockcha... by kaoD on Monday December 30, 2013 @06:15PM (#6987759)
Reading Bitmessage broadcasts requires following the user, so you can't see replies if you're not subscribed to the replying user. Twister feels more like Twitter, including searching, hashtags, etc.

Though I guess you could leverage BM's protocol and infrastructure to do that too (broadcasts are public you'd just have to filter the noise).

Re:Twister: P2P micro-blogging with accounts on the blockcha... by johnchristopher on Monday December 30, 2013 @06:55PM (#6987963)
The few times I installed bitmessage to see what it looked like it escaped me I could actually broadcast messages à la twitter. Might check out that part of the package in the coming future. Thanks for pointing it out.