Re:An Interview with Mark Fletcher, founder of Bloglines and...
by rjurney on Friday July 10, 2009 @09:00PM
(#698683)
Because they were pretty big acquisitions, built at a time when building to get acquired by bigger internet companies was a completely viable business model.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An Interview with Mark Fletcher, founder of Bloglines and...
by brunnock on Friday July 10, 2009 @09:05PM
(#698688)
The IRS doesn't recognize that business model. If a business has no expectation of making a profit, then it's a hobby.
Re:An Interview with Mark Fletcher, founder of Bloglines and...
by rjurney on Friday July 10, 2009 @09:16PM
(#698696)
At the time, eyeballs had a premium dollar value. Being 2 for 2, Mark is comfortably rich. Clearly in today's market one would need a more concrete revenue model than eyeballs.
Do you have a point?
Re:An Interview with Mark Fletcher, founder of Bloglines and...
by brunnock on Friday July 10, 2009 @09:23PM
(#698703)
Of course. The purpose of a business is to generate a profit. Anything else is a con. You might as well post an interview with the founders of Kozmo.
Re:An Interview with Mark Fletcher, founder of Bloglines and...
by rjurney on Friday July 10, 2009 @09:44PM
(#698718)
Both these businesses generated a large profit for their founders. Maybe if you learned from guys like Mark, as opposed to the IRS, you'd make a better Hacker News commenter and... I daresay, a better entrepreneur?
Re:An Interview with Mark Fletcher, founder of Bloglines and...
by gojomo on Friday July 10, 2009 @09:32PM
(#698708)
Both services, or their descendants, are still in operation at the profitable, ad-driven acquirers, years later.
We can thus assume they have been profitable or fit strategic goals which generate profits elsewhere for these companies.