Re: Shopping for Spy Gear: Catalog Advertises N.S.A. Toolbox
by superuser2 on Sunday December 29, 2013 @05:51PM
(#6981860)
Planting moles in foreign organizations is the explicit purpose and core competency of foreign intelligence agencies. It's only inside the US where that activity is (supposed to be) forbidden.
You should assume that the US intelligence community is already doing this to foreign tech corporations and has been forever.
Re: Shopping for Spy Gear: Catalog Advertises N.S.A. Toolbox
by malandrew on Sunday December 29, 2013 @07:26PM
(#6982330)
That's exactly my point. It was supposed to be forbidden domestically and that added trust to US-made technologies. However, now that we've learned that US companies are completely fair game, the level of access the government has to domestic companies via moles, NSLs and other acts of espionage, we should assume that domestic companies are far more compromised than foreign companies. This assumption is not only reasonable but the responsible assumption to hold if you are a foreigner.
Re: Shopping for Spy Gear: Catalog Advertises N.S.A. Toolbox
by Spooky23 on Sunday December 29, 2013 @11:06PM
(#6982977)
I think that's an issue with services based businesses like SaaS/PaaS/cloud providers. You're also making an assumption that national affiliation matters in a global company.
With hardware companies, I doubt there's much of a difference. Getting a mole placed in a foreign company is totally achievable, just a different set of motivators for the mole. Actually, you don't need to compromise an OEM computer or network manufacturer. Just pay off a contractor in the supply chain who manufactures key parts.
Even in the case of services/cloud, I doubt it matters. If the NSA hacked the chancellor of Germany's personal phone, what makes you think that they haven't compromised German cloud providers as well?
Re: Shopping for Spy Gear: Catalog Advertises N.S.A. Toolbox
by casca on Sunday December 29, 2013 @05:10PM
(#6981683)
Juniper were making good inroads into the corporate firewall market at the expense of Checkpoint. It'll be interesting to see whether this sees a move back to Checkpoint as the firewall product of choice.
Re: Shopping for Spy Gear: Catalog Advertises N.S.A. Toolbox
by midas007 on Sunday December 29, 2013 @11:24PM
(#6983032)
Another reason to consider pfSense (which could use a crowdfunded secaudit like TrueCrypt).
This is probably the most damning information I've seen of NSA activities. This is anti-American activity since it clearly harms US economic interests. This coupled with the policy that spying on foreigners is fair-game is enough reason to give any foreign government or company enough reason never to purchase equipment from US tech companies.
As an engineer in the US, this makes my blood boil. I really hope that this new information generates more interest in open-source network software and hardware.