Re:Mono outpaces Java in Linux desktop development
by krschultz on Friday July 10, 2009 @09:37AM
(#697642)
How can you trust an article with glaring factual inaccuracies underlying the primary argument?
"Eclipse 3.1 lacks features that MonoDevelop has, including code completion, integrated debugging, refactoring, and unit testing capabilities, Hargett claimed."
Are you kidding me?
And then the great "apps" they site for Mono are Gnome Do & Tomboy notes. Sorry but we're working on visual programming language plugins on top of Eclipse at my company, and the two Mono apps they site are to-do lists?
I'm all for Mono, I'm all for a discussion on how Sun screwed the Linux community over, but this article is not worth reading or talking about. Shoddy reporting all around.
"Eclipse 3.1 lacks features that MonoDevelop has, including code completion, integrated debugging, refactoring, and unit testing capabilities, Hargett claimed."
Are you kidding me?
And then the great "apps" they site for Mono are Gnome Do & Tomboy notes. Sorry but we're working on visual programming language plugins on top of Eclipse at my company, and the two Mono apps they site are to-do lists?
I'm all for Mono, I'm all for a discussion on how Sun screwed the Linux community over, but this article is not worth reading or talking about. Shoddy reporting all around.