News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Syntax control for the command line by tunesmith on Saturday December 28, 2013 @01:32AM (#6974209)
What's the point here? Is this a demonstration of prior art? Or is it just demonstrating that a patent's technology is easily re-implemented?

Because if it's the latter, that doesn't really prove anything. Patents are to protect technologies/inventions that are far easier to produce after invention than before. That's the good part of a patent, when the patent system works as designed.

If it's a demonstration of prior art though, that's pretty cool - it might help to make it more obvious, though.

Re:Syntax control for the command line by kainosnoema on Saturday December 28, 2013 @01:52AM (#6974251)
It's neither prior art (though it was started prior to the recent patent publicity), nor a re-implementation (as stated in the readme, it's just a wrapper around OS X's NSLinguisticTagger).

Why can't it just be a useful tool? I'm looking forward to using it while writing project documentation and will be working on editor plugins using the JSON formatted output (https://github.com/stephencelis/syn/commit/d2d36473f7295c6cf...).

Re:Syntax control for the command line by coldtea on Saturday December 28, 2013 @11:44AM (#6975338)
>What's the point here? Is this a demonstration of prior art? Or is it just demonstrating that a patent's technology is easily re-implemented?

No patent. iA took that back. One wasn't possible anyway -- not only this is 90% Apple's API, but even the UI implementation of this particular feature was already shown by Apple in WWDC 2011.

Re:Syntax control for the command line by Estragon on Saturday December 28, 2013 @11:13AM (#6975264)
It's an invitation to IA to dig themselves a deeper hole. :-)