Re:New Twist in International Relations: Corporate Keep-My-D...
by thisone on Friday December 27, 2013 @04:24AM
(#6970032)
I've been dealing with this for what seems like ages now. At my last job I actually had to go a get a new service shut down because the people who provisioned it didn't realise or understand that it was a problem that all the PID was being stored in the US.
I've read the Safe Harbor rules and audit information and I don't trust it one bit. I really can't blame corporations, especially EU ones, from stating very plainly that they don't want their data stored in the US.
Re:New Twist in International Relations: Corporate Keep-My-D...
by Nursie on Friday December 27, 2013 @04:42AM
(#6970064)
>> effectively creating FUD around US-based services.
FUD?
No, it's been explicit in law for some time that people's data was protected in Europe in ways it wasn't in the US.
Re:New Twist in International Relations: Corporate Keep-My-D...
by draugadrotten on Friday December 27, 2013 @04:38AM
(#6970058)
> European Union privacy legislation demands that sensitive data is stored within the EU
While this may be officially promoted as a way of protecting against EU citizens against NSA (US access) to the data, it is also a way for the EU to ensure that EU can get to the data when the EU wants access.
Re:New Twist in International Relations: Corporate Keep-My-D...
by bjelkeman-again on Friday December 27, 2013 @02:21AM
(#6969757)
So what did AMS-IX say?
When the Amsterdam Internet Exchange (AMS-IX) recently opened up an office in NYC there was a big fuss about it, because it would make the entire Dutch internet traffic subject to the Patriot act, since it applies to any company with an office on American soil.