Re:Good News You Might Have Missed in 2013
by sliverstorm on Thursday December 26, 2013 @08:57PM
(#6969030)
Why the f%ck do you care if he is doing it to be remembered? Since when was the value of charitable works derived from the motive?
Re:Good News You Might Have Missed in 2013
by icebraining on Saturday December 28, 2013 @09:30AM
(#6975047)
The discussion started by matthewmacleod is about the moral character of Bill Gates, not the value of his charitable works. For most people, intentions are important when discussing the former.
Re:Good News You Might Have Missed in 2013
by bluekitten on Thursday December 26, 2013 @10:11PM
(#6969248)
As usual, Linus shoots straight.
http://www.osnews.com/story/21887/Linus_Microsoft_Hatred_is_...
Dark ulterior motives? No. Being remembered as a philanthropist rather than a robber-baron is quite enough. Hs is doing good, but he is not doing good for the good of others.