News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Ruby Fast Yet? by w0rd-driven on Thursday December 26, 2013 @01:04PM (#6967133)
There is one sentence missing from each graph that would've made this a lot easier to grok:

"x is better" where x is more requests, faster startup time, or less memory usage.

I prefer graphs that lead me to what I should expect and that sentence would go a long way to eliminate the "mental math" I had to do to understand each one.

On another note, the 2 year graphs are particularly interesting. They're more consistent than not but those inconsistencies seem a little awkward.

Re:Is Ruby Fast Yet? by brianhempel on Thursday January 02, 2014 @07:06PM (#7003353)
The variance is sometimes due to RVM troubles. The benchmark is partly a test of the entire Ruby ecosystem. If RVM is bugging, then people are installing sub-optimal implementations. For example: https://github.com/wayneeseguin/rvm/issues/1418