News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 images available by ReidZB on Thursday December 26, 2013 @12:40PM (#6967022)
Checksums offer no security. An attacker can alter them right after altering the image. Now if the images were signed, it would be a different story...
Re:FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 images available by douglasheriot on Thursday December 26, 2013 @06:38PM (#6968660)
Checksums are also found in the PGP signed release email.
Re:FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 images available by cma on Thursday December 26, 2013 @01:49PM (#6967394)
As long as they send the cryptographic checksum through ssl/tls, you are fine. No need to send the whole file through it.
Re:FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 images available by repsilat on Thursday December 26, 2013 @02:41PM (#6967647)
Unfortunately, ftp.freebsd.org doesn't seem to support https.
Re:FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 images available by dignan on Thursday December 26, 2013 @01:30PM (#6967272)
Just to follow up on this, what checksums do offer is a way to verify that the file you have locally matches the remote file.
Re:FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 images available by testing12341234 on Thursday December 26, 2013 @02:28PM (#6967585)
Checksums do not offer this property if both the remote file and checksum are both sent unsecured. If an attacker can MitM the remote file, then they can also do the same for the checksum file.