Re:Ruby 2.1 Released
by VeejayRampay on Thursday December 26, 2013 @03:43AM
(#6965665)
I find it strange that JRuby would be the worst of all for all 4 categories though. Startup time I can understand, but given the right conditions, it's known to be pretty damn fast.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ruby 2.1 Released
by lobster_johnson on Friday December 27, 2013 @09:52AM
(#6970768)
The JVM most likely hasn't been tuned. If I recall correctly it's also a very old JVM that is being used.