Comparing the Cost of Different Multiple-return Techniques in C

Re:Comparing the Cost of Different Multiple-return Technique... by Tloewald on Monday December 23, 2013 @10:30AM (#6954704)

Well, I guess the final point is almost worth it -- code for clarity.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparing the Cost of Different Multiple-return Technique... by mitchty on Monday December 23, 2013 @10:40AM (#6954768)

Would've liked to see the exact code to better gauge what clarity involves specifically.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparing the Cost of Different Multiple-return Technique... by silentbicycle on Monday December 23, 2013 @10:45AM (#6954787)

I'm planning on posting a repo with the benchmarks soon.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparing the Cost of Different Multiple-return Technique... by mitchty on Monday December 23, 2013 @12:00PM (#6955215)

Cool beans. I saw this this morning and was excited.

I've been dealing with rewrites of a few internal utilities in C (was going to use go, but the runtime has issues) and was going to start testing how struct passing with errors in a struct for example would look in C.

I'll keep an eye out thanks!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparing the Cost of Different Multiple-return Technique... by silentbicycle on Friday December 27, 2013 @10:11AM (#6970843)

The code is up: https://github.com/atomicobject/multiple_return_in_c_benchma...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparing the Cost of Different Multiple-return Technique... by silentbicycle on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @02:14PM (#6960692)

Due to an inconveniently timed cold, it may still be another day or two. Soon.

[ Parent | on HN ]