News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bing, the Imitator, Often Goes Google One Better by andrewljohnson on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @02:47PM (#694410)
There is no comparison, and here's proof. Google hits my website basically every couple of seconds. At this rate, Google will crawl my site in total a few times a year, since we have millions of pages.

Bing, Yahoo, and all the rest only visit a few times a day. At this rate, they will spider my site completely....ummmm... never.

Re:Bing, the Imitator, Often Goes Google One Better by josefresco on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @06:33PM (#694858)
It's not the quantity, it's the quality that matters. Google has stated this publicly and while it's impressive they're indexing your site every few seconds, that might not be a good thing, or the 'right' thing for a search engine to be doing.

I could care less which search engine has the farthest reach (with few exceptions). What I (and most users I would suspect) really want is the best set of results that fulfill my query.

Re:Bing, the Imitator, Often Goes Google One Better by andrewljohnson on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @08:41PM (#694968)
Except it's really hard to know the quality of the page until you actually crawl it. PageRank graphs only take you a small percentage of the way to judging quality.
Re:Bing, the Imitator, Often Goes Google One Better by mikeryan on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @03:38PM (#694511)
If I had to guess, this is largely a scaling issue which Google has dealt with admirably. I doubt bing has anywhere near the capacity (yet) to do the level of indexing as well as google.

If it catches on I'd expect the visits to increase.