News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No thanks Google, we've got Ubuntu by secret on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @09:00AM (#693795)
Isn't this browser OS concept essentially what the Crunchpad aims to be?

Edit: Of course, the crunchpad is also the hardware component, making it more all-in-one.

Re:No thanks Google, we've got Ubuntu by roc on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @09:12AM (#693810)
The Crunchpad aims to be a browser. Specifically: a finger-friendly one.

GoogleOS would still be dealing with things like USB devices, a variety of internal hardware, offline processing, keyboard/mouse UI, desktop-class apps, etc.

Re:No thanks Google, we've got Ubuntu by TheBuddy on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @08:38PM (#694965)
You can see the comparison here between Arrington's vision and Google's post.

http://crunchpadfans.com/2009/07/08/google-steals-fusiongara...

Re:No thanks Google, we've got Ubuntu by jlees on Wednesday July 08, 2009 @10:57AM (#693993)
Now, Google Chrome OS running on the CrunchPad, wouldn't that be something...