Re:I wrote the Anarchist Cookbook in 1969. Now I see its pre...
by oinksoft on Thursday December 19, 2013 @07:46PM
(#6939135)
No! Pacifism has no spectrum, like anarchism. You can't have a little bit of government with anarchism any more than you can have a bit of violence with pacifism.
Re:I wrote the Anarchist Cookbook in 1969. Now I see its pre...
by Jtsummers on Thursday December 19, 2013 @10:17PM
(#6939715)
Read up on pacifism and its history and various philosophies. I use spectrum to indicate that there are a variety of pacifist philosophies and I'm not wrong, because there are a variety of pacifist philosophies. They all desire a world with zero violence. But some are willing to defend themselves or others against violence with violence, while others are not. Some won't even allow you to defend them, they'd rather fall on the sword than let another perform a violent act for their sake. To think that there's a singular philosophy on this issue is a totally ignorant position to take.
Re:I wrote the Anarchist Cookbook in 1969. Now I see its pre...
by oinksoft on Thursday December 19, 2013 @11:30PM
(#6939943)
How can you claim pacifism if you resort to violence? Pacifism is the rejection of violence, full stop. The ambiguity lies in the definition of "violence." Tolstoy called voting, paying taxes, and engaging in commerce forms of violence, for instance. Regardless, only using physical violence in defense doesn't make you a pacifist, it just means you don't attack people.
And if you really want to go to the definition, wiktionary [1] has it as:
Opposition to and avoidance of violence. Not necessarily an absolute rejection of it (though that is likely the ideal of all pacifists).[1] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pacifist