Re:$200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
by cperciva on Thursday December 19, 2013 @01:34AM
(#6933229)
The nonce-increment bug wasn't found as part of the bug bounty program; it was retroactively included when I set up the bug bounty program a few months later.
Re:$200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
by jaredly on Thursday December 19, 2013 @12:21AM
(#6933059)
the difference here is that there's no "fake-world" contest. Tarsnap is asking for a real-world hack of their system.
Telegram, on the other hand, is trying to prove that their algorithm is unbreakable. AES is pretty good too. As is noted in other comments, it's generally the system, not the algorithm, that gets broken.
It seems to me that offering a bug bounty can significantly improve the security of a system, even when the prize-money is relatively small.
[1] http://www.tarsnap.com/bugbounty.html
[2] http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2011-01-18-tarsnap-critical-...