News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Marriage of Figaro… and Rails 4.1 👰.

Re:The Marriage of Figaro… and Rails 4.1 👰 by dylandrop on Wednesday December 18, 2013 @11:45AM (#6928600)
Is Figaro even usable without Heroku? From what I understand the commands it offers are tailor-made for Heroku, and the main problem mentioned (secrets.yml not being Heroku-friendly) seems like specifically a Heroku problem. IMO I'd use Figaro for Heroku, and YML files for a VPS.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Marriage of Figaro… and Rails 4.1 👰 by laserlemon on Wednesday December 18, 2013 @11:47AM (#6928614)
Figaro is certainly usable without Heroku. It added some Heroku conveniences later in life, but is built to simply populate ENV while keeping source control clean.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Marriage of Figaro… and Rails 4.1 👰 by dylandrop on Wednesday December 18, 2013 @11:49AM (#6928636)
Good to know. I suppose for all cases where I'm deploying to non-Heroku servers I'd probably still use secrets.yml just because it's built into 4.1.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Marriage of Figaro… and Rails 4.1 👰 by laserlemon on Wednesday December 18, 2013 @11:53AM (#6928662)
Makes sense, now that it's the new convention. Thanks for the comment!
[ Parent | on HN ]