News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I want Bitcoin to die in a fire by Nursie on Wednesday December 18, 2013 @10:46AM (#6928132)
Sooooo very many times this has been addressed. Deflation is not bad because you can't divide currency any further. It's bad because it encourages the hoarding of cash, discourages lending, investment and spending, and it rewards effort yesterday more than effort today.

The "but we can subdivide!" is not an answer.

Re:Why I want Bitcoin to die in a fire by jessaustin on Wednesday December 18, 2013 @04:19PM (#6930869)
Have you ever seen an actual economist say this? I have a feeling Stross got his economy degree from a cereal box. Bitcoin is not the first asset in history to appreciate. Why haven't the wild swings we've seen in gold, oil, pork bellies, etc. had the horrible results you predict?

"Deflation" doesn't even relate to assets people aren't forced by law or other circumstances to use for regular commerce. For normal, non-currency assets like that, we say "appreciation" instead of "deflation". If 6 billion people decided to "hoard" BTC tomorrow, I guarantee there would be plenty of dollars/rubles/whatever available for investment, lending, and spending.

Honestly the hoarding argument is dumber than the precision argument, so I tried to give Stross the benefit of the doubt.

Re:Why I want Bitcoin to die in a fire by Nursie on Thursday December 19, 2013 @04:11AM (#6933611)
Oh so it's an asset now is it? I'll be sure to remember that next time a 'coiner tells me it's the world's best currency or payment method.

Deflation is only relevant if we're talking about BTC as a currency, which people do and therefore it's part of the discussion.