News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sequence of Events in the Cockpit on Asiana Flight 214 by WalterBright on Sunday December 15, 2013 @12:23AM (#6908487)
I worked on 757 flight controls design back in the early 1980's. I'm not a pilot and I'm not familiar with the Airbus designs.

The 757 flight controls were hydraulically operated, and were controlled by cables operated by the pilot that opened valves on the actuators (hydraulic rams) on the control surfaces. The pilot's controls did not directly feel the flow of air over the control surfaces feeding back into the stick, like a light plane would with the cables moving the control surfaces directly.

To correct this, Boeing designed a "feel computer" that would push back on the controls as if actual wind were pushing on the controls. The idea was that as close as possible the pilot's controls should "feel" like he was directly connected to the control surfaces.

The feel forces generated could be well over a hundred pounds, if I recall correctly, though Boeing had to reduce them in order to accommodate female pilots. Note that for a high performance aerobatic plane with direct controls, it is a physically exhausting task to control it.

My father flew B-17's, which were probably the biggest airplanes without hydraulically assisted controls. You had to be a strong man to fly it. It would fly with only one outboard engine running, but the force required on the rudder pedals meant the pilot and copilot had to constantly relieve each other.

Re:Sequence of Events in the Cockpit on Asiana Flight 214 by hatbert on Sunday December 15, 2013 @06:39PM (#6911641)
There were actually bigger planes, like the Martin JRM Mars (a large WWII flying boat) with a gross takeoff weight in excess of 165,000 lbs. They use a mechanism called a "servo tab," which is sort of like a control surface for the control surface. In essence, it deflects in the opposite direction of the control surface, and usually in proportion to the control force (a system of levers and springs measures the amount of force being transmitted to the controls by the surface).

The primary disadvantage, aside from the complexity of the system, is that it tends to delay feedback, which results in PIO.