News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2013 by Tyrannosaurs on Friday December 13, 2013 @08:18AM (#6900325)
But fiction comes with a warning, specifically that it is fiction. You can fact check non-fiction but fiction is completely open about the fact that you should consider what it's saying to be suspect - the default position on it is "this is made up".

The danger is - and Argo is one example but there are far, far worse (cough Dan Brown cough) - where you get fiction "based on true events". There are some lovely fictional biopics based on real people (Carter Beats the Devil springs to mind) but when you get the likes of the Da Vinci Code being taken as having some underlying truth I can see where you're coming from.

But I doubt very much that those people believing the "truth" in those works of fiction are the people fact checking non-fiction. In both those cases it feels as if the book isn't the problem, the person is.

Re:The Best Books I Read in 2013 by evacuationdrill on Friday December 13, 2013 @09:28AM (#6900610)
How far was Argo from the facts?
Re:The Best Books I Read in 2013 by Tyrannosaurs on Friday December 13, 2013 @09:41AM (#6900677)
There's a page or two on Wikipedia about it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo_(2012_film)

The basic idea (making a sci-fi film as a cover for getting people out of Iran) is true, after that it's fairly heavily dramatised and pro-Americanised.

Worth saying that Affleck has always been relatively upfront about the dramatisation when asked about it in interviews, though I've not seen him asked about his depiction of the actions of the Canadian, British and New Zealand governments.

Re:The Best Books I Read in 2013 by evacuationdrill on Friday December 13, 2013 @03:59PM (#6902881)
Crap, I was thinking of Zero Dark Thirty actually. I haven't seen Argo.

Thanks for the info, though. I have read about it before, and it's definitely an example of truth being stranger than fiction.