Re:Physical reality of string theory demonstrated
by tspiteri on Monday July 06, 2009 @11:14AM
(#689771)
Explaining phenomena is only one step. What I think is more important for a theory to have legs, is the ability to make predictions using the theory.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Physical reality of string theory demonstrated
by jacquesm on Monday July 06, 2009 @11:20AM
(#689778)
There is this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT
But it goes way over my head.
Explaining existing phenomena better than any other theory that we currently have goes a long way though.
Re:Physical reality of string theory demonstrated
by pbhjpbhj on Monday July 06, 2009 @02:59PM
(#690230)
It's not a theory until it can make testable predictions.
Re:Physical reality of string theory demonstrated
by gnaritas on Monday July 06, 2009 @10:16PM
(#690792)
I wouldn't quite say that because it implies we must have the ability to test it. A better thing to say is that a theory must provide falsifiable predictions, even if we don't have the ability to actually test it today.