News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Hydrogen Myth by potatolicious on Monday July 06, 2009 @03:19AM (#689282)
I agree with you entirely - converting clean electricity into a finicky form of transport seems ill-advised. That being said, battery technology has a long way to go before being able to power a car entirely.

For one thing, energy density needs to improvement by an order of magnitude to make mass application useful, and the average lifetime of the battery I would say would have to increase 2-3x. Batteries are expensive to manufacture and the ecological impact of disposal is also extremely high - better to make longer-lasting batteries than cheap crap.

Re:The Hydrogen Myth by bjelkeman-again on Monday July 06, 2009 @05:17AM (#689377)
Just saying that "the ecological impact of disposal [of batteries] is also extremely high" without differentiating between battery types is to simplify the issue too much I think. Some batteries are bad to throw away, others are less bad, but you can also recycle batteries.

"Lithium Ion batteries are classified by the federal government as non-hazardous waste and are safe for disposal in the normal municipal waste stream," says Kate Krebs at the National Recycling Coalition. http://bit.ly/wS344

In general, throwing away stuff that isn't naturally occuring in the eco system is often bad, and sometimes too much of something natural can be bad too. But blanket statements that something is bad don't help. The battery system would be replacing something else, like a petrol driven engine, which also has an environmental impact and is much less efficient.

Re:The Hydrogen Myth by likpok on Monday July 06, 2009 @11:51AM (#689830)
Furthermore, lead-acid (car) batteries are extremely easy to recycle (and are valuable; you almost always get a trade-in discount).