You can’t get entangled without a wormhole

Re:You can’t get entangled without a wormhole by yk on Sunday December 08, 2013 @01:31PM (#6870662)

I don't think that I am misrepresenting this, however I should perhaps have made clearer what I mean by classical vs. quantum. So I take the view, that entanglement can be traced back to the smaller than naively expected state space, which is something that can be constructed in classical physics. If you then quantize such a system, then the system would be in a superposition of the classical states.

The problem of local realism then arises from this smaller state space and the collapse of the wave function during the measurement.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You can’t get entangled without a wormhole by EliRivers on Sunday December 08, 2013 @04:24PM (#6871487)

So are you saying it is, or is not, odd that a decision made here can affect something a light year away? If you don't find that odd that's great for you; you obviously have a far more intuitive understanding of the universe than most people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You can’t get entangled without a wormhole by yk on Monday December 09, 2013 @01:20AM (#6873059)

Assuming that it actually effects a particle at a distance, it is odd. But I simply see it as a oddity of the collapse of the wave function, which is no more surprising than finding just one photon in a double slit experiment even when the detectors are space like separated.

[ Parent | on HN ]