News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Further improving digital certificate security by StavrosK on Sunday December 08, 2013 @10:13AM (#6869877)
Doesn't Chrome use certificate pinning? It seems that it would be immune to this, no?
Re:Further improving digital certificate security by jonknee on Sunday December 08, 2013 @10:28AM (#6869916)
Yes, which is how they found out about the fraudulent cert. They went ahead and revoked the entire intermediate CA because Chrome doesn't pin the whole internet and if Google confirmed fraud on their own domain it has to assume there are others.

Chrome's popularity and Google's use of pinning to their own properties is a pretty powerful combination to detect MITM.

Re:Further improving digital certificate security by agl on Sunday December 08, 2013 @10:47AM (#6869978)
Note that we haven't said that pinning found this event. We have several channels by which we receive information about these sorts of things.
Re:Further improving digital certificate security by jonknee on Sunday December 08, 2013 @11:53AM (#6870199)
Fascinating. I assume that means Chrome wasn't used with the cert otherwise pinning should have been the giveaway.
Re:Further improving digital certificate security by StavrosK on Sunday December 08, 2013 @10:31AM (#6869926)
> Chrome's popularity and Google's use of pinning to their own properties is a pretty powerful combination to detect MITM.

Plus the fact that Chrome reports back to Google when it finds a valid certificate that's not the pinned one.

Re:Further improving digital certificate security by agl on Sunday December 08, 2013 @10:18AM (#6869885)
For Google properties yes, but not for the majority of sites.