News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ArangoDB by coolsunglasses on Friday December 06, 2013 @02:48AM (#6859961)
I like that they're sufficiently ignorant of MongoDB's implementation to misattribute the primary cause of excessive space usage.

Gives me confidence trust them with my data.

Re:ArangoDB by neunhoef on Friday December 06, 2013 @04:55AM (#6860326)
The big advantage of ArangoDB with respect to memory/disk usage is that despite the Schema-less-ness, the database automatically recognises common "shapes" of the documents in a collection and thus usually does not have to store all attribute names many times. In addition, the possibility of transactions makes it less necessary to keep many old revisions of documents, in comparison to for example MongoDB.
Re:ArangoDB by coolsunglasses on Friday December 06, 2013 @02:15PM (#6863019)
I'd be more interested in a document store that was historical and didn't mutate.

Failing that, I'll just keep using RethinkDB for this sort of thing.

Re:ArangoDB by neunhoef on Friday December 06, 2013 @03:49AM (#6860141)
What do you think is the primary cause of excessive space usage in MongoDB?
Re:ArangoDB by coolsunglasses on Friday December 06, 2013 @02:23PM (#6863074)
http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/faq/storage/#faq-disk-size

Well known and understood. Even well-documented by 10gen themselves, nothing to do with the bling you added to Arango.