Re:Benchmarking D vs Go vs Erlang vs C for MQTT broker
by andralex on Thursday December 05, 2013 @04:18PM
(#6857318)
Quite a few things.
The Go version was written by a person enthusiastic and presumably competent in Go. See their perspective here where he concedes defeat on the performance front: http://blog.nella.org/mqtt-code-golf/
Adding C as a baseline is entirely appropriate.
The source code for C, Go, and D is available. The Erlang version may or may not at the discretion of its author.
Probably a more sensible hypothesis is that you like Go and saw a result that is unfavorable to it, so you had an emotional response.
The Go version was written by a person enthusiastic and presumably competent in Go. See their perspective here where he concedes defeat on the performance front: http://blog.nella.org/mqtt-code-golf/
Adding C as a baseline is entirely appropriate.
The source code for C, Go, and D is available. The Erlang version may or may not at the discretion of its author.
Probably a more sensible hypothesis is that you like Go and saw a result that is unfavorable to it, so you had an emotional response.